A still from a television ad currently running for Metamucil:
The bulk of the ad shows pieces of luscious fruit raining down the screen. However the actual product contains no fruit. Truth in advertising?
About This Blog
I am Peter Rukavina and this is my blog. I am a writer, letterpress printer, and a curious person.
To learn more about me, read my /now, look at my bio, listen to audio I’ve posted, read presentations and speeches I’ve written, or get in touch (peter@rukavina.net is the quickest way).
You can subscribe to an RSS feed of posts, an RSS feed of comments, or a podcast RSS feed that just contains audio posts. You can also receive a daily digests of posts by email.
Comments
During the ‘consumer
During the ‘consumer consciousness’ raising of the ’70s I was in Jr. High and had a teacher (Ray MacCormick) who was fully swept up in the movement. Back then we used to discuss the rules and restrictions advertisers must follow. It would be my *impression* that such an ad would have been contrary to code and refused broadcast in the late ’70s. Am I right? Did the rules change? Why would such an ad (with the tiny print that I’ll bet pops up just at the end) be allowed?
I guess Ray did his job — I’m still curious about this stuff.
Add new comment