I’ve been thinking of printing a short book on my Golding Jobber letterpress. Its capacity to print materials up to 12 by 18 inches means that I could print multiple book pages on a single sheet of paper that would then be folded and cut into “signatures” that would then be bound together to make the book.

The first thing I needed to understand was how imposition works — how the pages get arranged for printing so that when the sheet they are printed on is folded and cut the pages end up in the right order.

So I started by making a mock-up out of a sheet of letter-sized paper. I folded the sheet twice, then numbered the pages as they would appear once the sheet was cut along the short edge:

NOKIA Lumia 800_000621

When I unfolded the mock-up, this is how it looked:

NOKIA Lumia 800_000622

Consulting The Compositor’s Handbook, a very helpful 1854 book that’s been digitized from the collection of Oxford University, I turned to the section on imposition that concerned the quarto — a sheet folded twice to make 8 pages of a book — and found the layout was supposed to look like this:

quarto

That didn’t look like my mockup — it was reverse — and I spent a lot of time making new mock-ups to see if I’d done something wrong. Try as I may — it might be clear that I do not excel in two-dimensional thinking — I couldn’t figure out what I was doing wrong.

Fortunately when I got home last night there was a copy of General Printing: An Illustrated Guide to Letterpress Printing waiting for me, ordered a few days ago. In the imposition section of this book was a very helpful illustration that solved my perceptual issue:

NOKIA Lumia 800_000619

Note how there’s a figure illustrating “sheet layout” and another illustrating “stone layout.” My problem was that I was confusing the two.

Sheet layout is “how the sheet will look once it is printed” and so it’s laid out just like my mock-up. Stone layout is “how you need to lay the pages out for printing” which is right-left reverse of sheet layout because — and herein lies the heart of my ignorance — when you print something on a printing press, left becomes right and vice versa.

You’d think I would have figured out this out by now, what with two years of setting type right to left. But, like I said, thinking in more than a single dimension is not my strong suit.

Now, on to the next step of book-making.

Peter Rukavina

Comments

Submitted by RitchieS on

Permalink

1/ You might try folding first as if ready for the trimmer and numbering afterwards.

2/ Irony alert - looking on the net for advice about ink printing, and letterpress at that.

Hoppy Easter.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <b> <i> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

About This Blog

Photo of Peter RukavinaI am . I am a writer, letterpress printer, and a curious person.

To learn more about me, read my /now, look at my bio, listen to audio I’ve posted, read presentations and speeches I’ve written, see things I’ve favourited elsewhere, or get in touch (peter@rukavina.net is the quickest way).

I have been writing here since May 1999: you can explore the 25+ years of blog posts in the archive.

You can subscribe to an RSS feed of posts, an RSS feed of comments, an RSS feed of favourites elsewhere, or a podcast RSS feed that just contains audio posts. You can also receive a daily digests of posts by email. I also publish an OPML blogroll.

InstagramYouTubeVimeoORCIDOpenStreetMapInternet ArchivePEI.artDrupalGithub.