Here’s what appears on the botton of the CBC Charlottetown home page:
What I am wondering is: couldn’t all come to some general consensus that we’re all not responsible for the contents of the sites we link to. I mean, doesn’t this just make common sense? Who would assume that if the CBC links to www.Evil.com that the CBC has come out in favour of evil?
And, while we’re at it, can we also come to an agreement that if coats and other personal belongings hung on a restaurant coat rack are stolen, it’s not the restaurant’s fault?
And that you can’t park in somebody’s driveway unless they have a sign that says “it’s okay to park here?”
We might put some sign painters out of work, but we would relieve the world of a lot of visual pollution.
About This Blog
I am Peter Rukavina and this is my blog. I am a writer, letterpress printer, and a curious person.
To learn more about me, read my /now, look at my bio, listen to audio I’ve posted, read presentations and speeches I’ve written, or get in touch (peter@rukavina.net is the quickest way).
You can subscribe to an RSS feed of posts, an RSS feed of comments, or a podcast RSS feed that just contains audio posts. You can also receive a daily digests of posts by email.
Comments
…which again brings up the
…which again brings up the “No Turning” sign out on North River Road just across the street from SlyOrange.
Perhaps the potentates over there a SyOng caused the whole problem in the first place with their gluttonous and indifferent turning.
I like the concept of
I like the concept of Worldwide Assumptions. I would like to propose a humble assupmption: that the timestamps on weblog posts serve as the permanent link to that post.
Kevin, it’s true, we silveroranges have been known to turn indescriminantly. But not at the infamous “No Turning” sign - we’re affraid of mean people with signs.
Add new comment