Open Bread

Peter Rukavina

[[Olle Jonsson]] and I have started a project that we’re calling [[Open Bread]]. The question we’re exploring is “do open source practices and principles have application in creating and managing non-digital ‘real world’ projects?”

Charlottetown needs a good bakery: you hear people say this all the time, especially when they’re talking about “downtown revitalization.” The usual route for a bakery to be founded would be for some plucky entrepreneur to come along and invest their time and money in starting a business. But that hasn’t happened. Can open source step into the breach: can the energy of the community, and interested others (like Olle) be harnessed to do what private enterprise hasn’t?

We don’t know. But on the [[Open Bread]] page of the Rukapedia we’re going to explore the idea.

Comments

Submitted by paul on

Permalink

How interested are you people in becoming bakers? It might be possible to take turn and turn alike and make the stuff you like. Easily said, since I have done this for a living and still do it at home, but it’s not ‘ “that” ’ hard.

In addition to Whole Earth, I have found The Bread Bible to be a useful resource: it removes a lot of the guesswork and mystery but preserves the experience with a maximum of fun.

Submitted by MJ on

Permalink

I would love a bakery. It would be ideal is they could stick to basics but of high quality. Pure ingrediants with no “traces” of this or that. That’s the big problem with the current grocery store bakeries (if you can call them that). All there food is off-limits to nut and peanut allergy persons becasue it is all possibly contaminated with things (ex. traces of nuts) when nuts are clearly not meant to be in that food product. No wonder allergies are a problem!

Submitted by Peter Rukavina on

Permalink

One of the keys, I think, to a successful open source bakery implementation is shifting pronoun use to “we” from “they.”

Submitted by Nathan on

Permalink

Bread lacks the unique characteristic that makes the Open Source model work so well for software. Software can be duplicated at zero-cost thus there is no free-loading problem. Everyone gets more out than they put in. The infamous hacker ESR writes about the “tragedy of the commons” in his essay on the economics of open source software, The Magic Cauldron
. Of course there are sucessful co-ops for products that do not have zero-cost duplication. I believe that such sucess is due to good design/management of the co-op. For these products the margin is smaller between individual benefit and the maximum individual contribution, making maintaining the margin more difficult to maintain than it is for open source software.

Submitted by oliver on

Permalink

Open source sourdough starter duplicates at less than the cost of CDs or memory. Sourdough bread bites occupy more space than computer bytes though, so the real estate overhead might be higher.

Submitted by Alan on

Permalink

Isn’t there a viable zero-net-cost argument, Nate? Unlike software, we each must eat and therefore will expend on a regular basis on bread as a staple. Isn’t the economic argument just tapping into that natural and inevitable flow?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <b> <i> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

About This Blog

Photo of Peter RukavinaI am . I am a writer, letterpress printer, and a curious person.

To learn more about me, read my /nowlook at my bio, listen to audio I’ve posted, read presentations and speeches I’ve written, or get in touch (peter@rukavina.net is the quickest way). 

You can subscribe to an RSS feed of posts, an RSS feed of comments, or a podcast RSS feed that just contains audio posts. You can also receive a daily digests of posts by email.

Search