I have long held that serif typefaces are the only true typefaces to properly read body text.
This comes as a result of fealty to the elegance of a good serif, attachment to some classic typefaces (Bodoni, University of California Old Style, Baskerville), but mostly from the kind of assholishness that comes from holding on to an irrational idea for too long (I got into an argument with someone about this years and years ago, and, the more I argued, the more I dug a deep hole for myself from which I could not escape).
Things came to a head this week: I published a post that contained an inordinate number of numero signs. In the typeface that had long been used here for body text, Vollkorn, these rendered inelegantly for reasons I never got to the bottom of.
Unable to withstand the flaky numeros any longer, I played with a few serif faces, all of which were wrong in some way (or simply less readable). Then I read of a new release of the sans serif Inter, and decided, on a lark, to try it out.
And I loved it.
So here it shall remain, in all its dreamy irrational lack of serif.
Comments
Love this. I am team sans
Love this. I am team sans serif all the way.
Wow, I love this typeface.
Wow, I love this typeface.
Oddly, I just started working
I just started working on a new project with a new client this week, and they use Inter for everything, so I installed it on Monday. While I'm not that fond of it for typesetting display copy, and the tracking seems wonky, and I find the bolds a bit too shouty, I really appreciate its x-height, allowing for greater legibility. It's a very accessible font, and looks great on screen. Good choice.
I miss the serifs -- much
I miss the serifs -- much more representative of emotion and thoughtfulness, which your blog exemplifies. But . . . the times, they are a-changin'
Add new comment