Good-bye Island Tel

Peter Rukavina

It’s seems as good a time as any to write the eulogy for Island Tel: the new telephone books are out, and they’re quite clearly Aliant-branded, with the old Island Tel name having shrunk to a tag-line along with the names of the other old-line telephone companies.

You can’t really blame Island Tel, err Aliant, err BCE for making themselves bigger and bigger and thus less and less local: everyone else is doing it, after all. From Home Depot to Verizon to Air Canada, our service corporations are expanding and becoming more generic and distant.

I can’t help wonder, though, what would happen if Island Tel’s shareholders had decided to be brave, buck the trend, and reinvest themselves in being a local telephone company, managed and controlled locally, responding to local needs, driving the local economy, employing local people? Surely, if nothing else, to do so would have been to leverage the company’s (and the Island’s) natural strengths: strong local brand, unusual customer loyalty, and the uncanny ability of Islanders to be nimble, flexible and wily as a compensation for small size and fewer resources.

The sad thing is, we’ll never know what might have happened. What we do know, with some certainty, is that as we become aliantienated over the months and years to come we’ll no doubt have access to a broader range of services, more attractively priced. Offered by a generic company controlled from Halifax, essentially indistinguishable from any other telco in North America.

It’s not so much that things will get worse: it’s that we’re left to wonder how much better things could have been.

Good-bye, Island Tel.

Comments

Submitted by Allan Rankin on

Permalink

I recall a certain former chief executive officer of Island Tel requesting a meeting with the then Leader of the Official Opposition, for the purpose if explaining a “housekeeping” amendment to the company’s legislation. The substance of that amendment was to allow shareholders to sell their shares more easily, and to make it easier to alter the company’s corporate name. I recall being told that such legislative changes were purely incidental, but nevertheless important, and that in no way did they presage a wholesale change in corporate control or ownership.

The amendments were quietly made during that legislative session, and like so many other bills that are spirited through the House on a greasy rail of political bi-partisanship, the people of the province discover their true consequences only much later.

Yes, farewell Island Tel, and hello whatever!

Submitted by Alan on

Permalink

And I just got an e-mail from the company with 2343 names that they are cutting out the free Netlife magazine but that I can pay for the new magazine. While they did not add the Canada Post “improvement of service claim”, it is implied.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <b> <i> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

About This Blog

Photo of Peter RukavinaI am . I am a writer, letterpress printer, and a curious person.

To learn more about me, read my /nowlook at my bio, listen to audio I’ve posted, read presentations and speeches I’ve written, or get in touch (peter@rukavina.net is the quickest way). 

You can subscribe to an RSS feed of posts, an RSS feed of comments, or a podcast RSS feed that just contains audio posts. You can also receive a daily digests of posts by email.

Search