"Beds" vs. "Homes"

Peter Rukavina

We should stop talking about “residential beds” for people with disabilities and instead talk of “homes,” like we do for everyone else.

Comments

Submitted by Oliver Rukavina on

Permalink

We need both (Beds and Homes) so Need to be equal to everyone because Everyone has a different approach for beds and they also need a home to live because of their disability.

Submitted by Liz Arbing on

Permalink

I was dismayed,when I heard the term residential beds being used.
I feel the term residence or home is appropriate ,as it is for all citizens of PEI.

Submitted by Cheryl Green on

Permalink

They talk about housing toward the end, but that's not good enough. Should be in the title, and should be the policy priority. It's the same here in the U.S. If you're talking about institutionalization, you're talking about "beds." Psychiatric wards are beds, prisons are beds, group homes for disabled people are beds. Their bias is showing, both with the leaders and with the journalists. The term further marginalizes already marginalized people. Oof.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • Allowed HTML tags: <b> <i> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

About This Blog

Photo of Peter RukavinaI am . I am a writer, letterpress printer, and a curious person.

To learn more about me, read my /nowlook at my bio, read presentations and speeches I’ve written, or get in touch (peter@rukavina.net is the quickest way). You can subscribe to an RSS feed of posts, an RSS feed of comments, or receive a daily digests of posts by email.

Search